Macron, Bastille Day
Digest more
Both Rey and Roy had alleged they were “[Intimidated] by the authorities” as members of the Paris establishment attempted to conceal the “state secret.”
1d
Africanews on MSNFrench first lady Brigitte Macron to take libel case to highest court of appealsFrance's President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron react during a visit to The British Museum in London, Wednesday July 9, 2025.
France's first lady hopes the Court of Cassation will side with her against two women who allege she is a biological male.
France’s first lady is taking her fight to the country's highest appeals court after two women were cleared by a lower court of spreading false rumours online that she used to be a man, her lawyer
Brigitte Macron, the wife of the French president, has lodged an appeal with France's highest appeals court, the Court of Cassation, after the Paris court of appeal last Thursday acquitted two
The disinformation campaign gained traction online and was picked up by conspiracy theorists both in France and abroad, including fringe circles in the United States.
6don MSN
Brigitte Macron’s sweet interaction with Kate Middleton has been decoded by a professional lip reader. The royal family rolled out the welcome wagon for French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Tuesday — complete with a horse-drawn carriage ride, traditional procession and a lavish State Banquet at Windsor Castle.
Brigitte Macron has no plans to divorce her husband, President Emmanuel Macron, before his presidency concludes in May 2027.
In a surprising turn, Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey, previously convicted of defaming Brigitte Macron with claims she was born a man, have been acquitt
The two women had been found guilty of libel by a lower court for spreading false claims about Brigitte Macron's gender.
A French court has overturned the defamation convictions of two women who claimed Brigitte Macron was born male, reigniting a conspiracy theory that has stalked Frances First Lady for years. The ruling calls into question the balance between free speech and defamation,