The Trump administration’s decision to cap how much NIH will pay for indirect costs on university research grants would cost 10 red states more than $1 billion.

NIH plans to slash support for indirect research costs, sending shockwaves through science Capping these payments would ‘just grind our scientific complex to a halt,’ one researcher said ...

The new NIH policy will cap that indirect cost rate at 15%, effective immediately. FILE - The main building of the National Institutes of Health is seen in Bethesda, Md., ...

NIH: "The average indirect cost rate reported by NIH has averaged between 27% and 28% over time. And many organizations are much higher—charging indirect rates of over 50% and in some cases over ...

These items are not included as indirect costs, but it could still mean a large loss in revenue for St. Jude. Over the past five years, St. Jude has annually received over $100 million from the NIH.

The proposed 15% cap for indirect costs is almost half the average NIH indirect cost rate reported over recent years, which was 27–29%, but extended beyond 50% for some institutes. The variation here ...

While the 15% cap on indirect costs proposed by NIH is on par with what most foundations pay, universities have gone along with taking significantly less than their actual overhead costs from ...

Last fiscal year, Hunter’s lab received $295,268 in NIH indirect cost funding, which he said was allocated to research resources, utilities, and personnel, among other things. “The potential cuts to ...

When announcing its decision to cap indirect cost payments, the NIH said this change will save the agency billions of dollars. 1 The NIH said it spent more than $35 billion on research grants in ...

As of Monday, the NIH’s new policy to cap indirect cost reimbursement rates to 15 percent of a given grant, regardless of institution location, scale, or initiative, is in effect.