Almost any article you read about Section 230 reminds you that it contains the most important 26 words in tech and that it is the law that made the modern internet. This is all true, but Section 230 ...

Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., are vocal critics of Section 230. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, passed in 1996 as part of the ...

As litigation around the country against tech companies and social media platforms continue to develop, questions remain around Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the limited federal ...

Almost any article you read about Section 230 reminds you that it contains the most important 26 words in tech and that it is the law that made the modern internet. This is all true, but Section 230 ...

Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent every weekday. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. There are few laws more fundamental to the way the internet works ...

A case that was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges this law—namely whether tech companies are liable for the material posted on their platforms. A second case ...

The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a win to Big Tech on Thursday, when it basically avoided weighing in on the limits of a key piece of tech law called Section 230. It’s a segment of the Communications ...

A Supreme Court case set for oral arguments on Feb. 21 could transform the web as we know it. The case was brought by the family of a woman killed in a 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris.

Congress passed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in 1996 when the internet was just coming onto the horizon for commercial use, and there was a need to protect nascent platforms from ...

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Daryl Lim, Penn State (THE CONVERSATION) Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ...