Despite Prop. 13’s victory with 64.8 percent of the vote, tax-and-spend progressives immediately filed a lawsuit directly in the California Supreme Court seeking to invalidate the new measure.

Assuming a state decides to retain a property tax at all – and some states are planning full repeals – a system like Prop. 13 provides stability to both property owners and government.

The Save Prop. 13 Act of 2026 will reverse these court-created loopholes and restore the tax relief first started with Proposition 13. In 2017, the California Supreme Court’s decision in ...

Despite Prop. 13’s victory with 64.8 percent of the vote, tax-and-spend progressives immediately filed a lawsuit directly in the California Supreme Court seeking to invalidate the new measure.

Assuming a state decides to retain a property tax at all – and some states are planning full repeals – a system like Prop. 13 provides stability to both property owners and government.

Despite Prop. 13’s victory with 64.8 percent of the vote, tax-and-spend progressives immediately filed a lawsuit directly in the California Supreme Court seeking to invalidate the new measure.

Assuming a state decides to retain a property tax at all – and some states are planning full repeals – a system like Prop. 13 provides stability to both property owners and government.

Assuming a state decides to retain a property tax at all – and some states are planning full repeals – a system like Prop. 13 provides stability to both property owners and government.

Despite Prop. 13’s victory with 64.8 percent of the vote, tax-and-spend progressives immediately filed a lawsuit directly in the California Supreme Court seeking to invalidate the new measure.

But the fear among homeowners that the market value of their homes will drive property taxes is muted in California because of Proposition 13. In addition to limiting the maximum tax rate to 1%, Prop.